首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of the impact speed and angle conditions for the EN1317 barrier tests
【2h】

Assessment of the impact speed and angle conditions for the EN1317 barrier tests

机译:评估EN1317障碍物测试的撞击速度和角度条件

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Roadside safety barriers designs are tested with passenger cars in Europe using standard EN1317 in which the impact angle for normal, high and very high containment level tests is 20°. In comparison to EN1317, the US standard MASH has higher impact angles for cars and pickups (25°) and different vehicle masses. Studies in Europe (RISER) and the US have shown values for the 90th percentile impact angle of 30°–34°. Thus, the limited evidence available suggests that the 20° angle applied in EN 1317 may be too low.The first goal of this paper is to use the US NCHRP database (Project NCHRP 17–22) to assess the distribution of impact angle and collision speed in recent ROR accidents. Second, based on the findings of the statistical analysis and on analysis of impact angles and speeds in the literature, an LS-DYNA finite element analysis was carried out to evaluate the normal containment level of concrete barriers in non-standard collisions. The FE model was validated against a crash test of a portable concrete barrier carried out at the UK Transport Research Laboratory (TRL).The accident data analysis for run-off road accidents indicates that a substantial proportion of accidents have an impact angle in excess of 20°. The baseline LS-DYNA model showed good comparison with experimental acceleration severity index (ASI) data and the parametric analysis indicates a very significant influence of impact angle on ASI. Accordingly, a review of European run-off road accidents and the configuration of EN 1317 should be performed.
机译:在欧洲的乘用车上,使用标准EN1317对路边安全栅栏设计进行了测试,其中正常,高和非常高密闭度测试的冲击角均为20°。与EN1317相比,美国标准MASH对汽车和皮卡车(25°)和不同的车辆质量具有更大的冲击角。欧洲(RISER)和美国的研究表明,第90个百分位撞击角的值是30°–34°。因此,有限的证据表明EN 1317中的20°角可能太低。本文的首要目标是使用美国NCHRP数据库(NCHRP 17-22项目)评估冲击角和碰撞的分布最近发生的ROR事故的速度加快。其次,基于统计分析的结果以及文献中对冲击角和速度的分析,进行了LS-DYNA有限元分析,以评估非标准碰撞中混凝土屏障的正常围护水平。 FE模型已通过英国运输研究实验室(TRL)对便携式混凝土路障的碰撞测试进行了验证。对径流道路事故的事故数据分析表明,很大一部分事故的冲击角超过20°。基线LS-DYNA模型与实验加速度严重性指数(ASI)数据具有良好的比较,参数分析表明冲击角对ASI的影响非常显着。因此,应对欧洲径流道路事故和EN 1317的配置进行审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号